AND she is back..................for more.............

Yip the good 'old' (and she certainly looks it here) Siobhan McNulty.

Is it just me or does she have the face of a weasel?

She's been involved with the most shocking Family Court case ever seen in New Zealand where Siobhan wants to place a child with a sex offender.

Siobhan does NOT CARE ABOUT ANY CHILD. She is a truly vicious person. I think she might be menopausal too!

She has had to respond to misconduct complaint.

http://nzfamilycourt.com/2013/10/18/canturbury-law-society-manager-malcolm-ellis-works-to-protect-one-of-their-own-siobhan-mcnulty-against-the-evidence-of-gross-incompetance/

http://newzealandjudges.blogspot.com.au/2013/07/what-do-these-people-have-in-common.html

Well I know a bit more about this wee lawyer, who wants to use and abuse children. All for profit too of course.

I even have some really interesting tape recordings. And she has to be about the most stupidest person in Christchurch (or at least in the running for the title).

Funny enough, I had a conversation with a person last night and we reckon Siobhan McNulty would be the PERFECT family court lawyer to take a 'negligence case' against. Moneys not a problem, and neither is finding a QC to take the case- that's been sorted.

I already know of two previous 'child' clients of Siobhan McNulty who have a LOT to say about what she did to them in 2001 (in short terms she stopped them from seeing their father through lies and false documents, but it didn't work because they ran away from their mother to be with their father). They hate her with a passion and very much enjoy telling people what she and the Christchurch family court did.

Plus I know off TWO mothers who also would be keen to see Siobhan McNulty brought to justice.

So stay tuned, I am going to put up some court documents and tape recordings of Siobhan. But in mean time that's get her family on board and aware of what this little wee weasel has been doing.













 

A day in the life of the Author of 'Who's Judging the Judges'...

So I daily received emails from people who want to know..
'who are you'?
'Tells us about who your are?'
'I love reading your blog and want to know more who you are?'
'Keep up the good work, I have struggled for years with the family court and reading your blog gives me hope that one day they might listen'.
'I want to read your books, where can I buy them?'
'Go get them Wendy, give them shit'!.

They go on...........................

Some know who I am, my story and what I do. But.........................

So far I have told my readers I have been a family court advocate for 12 years. This is true. I want to expand on this a little......

How did I become so involved in the Family Court?

My husbands own battle with this ex-partner. Yes the 'Dunedin Case' posted about here is my husbands case with his ex-partner. There is a face book group and she is named in so there is no secret as too who she is. We also have a book coming about his battle to see his son.

This case will blow your mind over how ignorant the Family Court is. And a mental note. She is a TEACHER, yes New Zealand you let people who abuse their own children teach others. Congratulations. All interactions with her have been tape recorded, including texts and threatening phone calls. New Zealand is the only country in the world who allows people with this type of history to teach children. Once again, congratulations NZ, your outstanding, you truly are.

Yes I maybe bias, but my husband is the most perfect man in the world. I come home at night and I have roses waiting for me, a cooked dinner and everything done (note I work 12 hours a day). My husband is my soul mate, he is awesome beyond compare! I would personally die for my husband. He IS perfect in every way.

Every one of my friends comments on how awesome my husband is.

We are also very 'in tuned' with each other. I came home yesterday to find a four poster bed in my room. Why? Because for the last four years my dream has been to have a four poster bed. Well my husband found a 'library four poster bed' at Harvey Norman and went out and brought it for me, to surprise me! (the library bit is for the fact I love books and write books). How perfect is that?

This is it..
http://www.harveynorman.com.au/library-queen-4-poster-bed.html

I have a picture of it in my room, but I can't upload it until I get to work as my mobile broadband wont let me. But I will upload it when I get to the office.

I had tears when I saw it.

Sorry ladies, he's all mine and you can't have him! He is tooo perfect!

Two months ago I lost my wedding ring and engagement ring. I had hired a car in Melbourne. But due to the 'heat' my fingers swelled up and I took my rings off and put them in the ash tray of the car. When I returned the car I forgot about my rings. They were never found :(

I was too scared to tell hubby. When I finally did he said 'That's ok sweetie we can buy you new ones and I can get you that eternity ring I have been wanting to get you'. Oh my god! was my thinking!
I thought he was going to be upset! I cried!

He's perfect! in every way. And that's how all husbands and wives should think about each other regardless. The 'divorcing generation' should hang their heads in shame'.


It makes me laugh at those who's marriages end after three years. My husband and I plan on being that old couple still holding hands walking together down the road (or around the mall). And sitting on our front porch rocking our arm chairs. This is how marriage is MEANT to be people!
Our friends tell us, if we can survive what my husbands ex puts us throughs, we can survive anything- and it is true. (yes, she is that evil and jealous!). Stay tuned you will get to read it all very soon.

Then there is my ex-husband. Oh yes it comes in two's people!

My ex-husband IS a domestic violent predator. ALL comfortably tape recorded AND now on youtube for your viewing pleasure or dis-pleasure.

To be continued...my laptop needs charging..............


Continued..

Ok, so my husband has a 'nutcase' ex, she admits in court to 'obstructing access'  and I have a 'mentally unwell' ex. Yes, do feel sorry for us. we have it all! This is why I symphonise with both fathers and mothers! we are the only people in new Zealand who have the perfect situation from BOTH sides. We have a mother who obstructs access for no reason and a father from the other side, who is a nut case.

You will not get a New Zealander who knows BOTH sides. Which is why I support both MOTHERS AND FATHERS fighting ignorance of the family court. Plus I am the most experienced at both.

Lets continue.

My ex-husband has mental health issues. He suffers anxiety, depression and manic depression episode. His GP doctor has him ladled as a 'hypochondriac'. He has a 'high users card' because of this. He suffers from what he describes, as 'dizziness in the head'. (or, if your a doctor, frontal lobe issues').

In layman terms, he's an idiot who has a brain tumour and mental health issues.

He is a ticking time bomb.

The police thought it was a fantastic idea to give him a gun license and access to guns.

A perfect 'suicide, murder' mix.

The family court thought it was a perfect mix to give him children.

Hands up who see's a disaster coming?

Yip, another family court massacre coming your way. Stay tuned to 'stuff' all the reporters know this case.

I left my husband in 2002 (that's a ruff guess because I don't dwell on the past like others) he had a 'manic depression' episode and attacked my son. (All recorded and coming to youtube this week).

Long story shot (long version on an international website and made visible to New Zealand in three weeks). For 13 years both my eldest children have been in my care because my ex- is a 'nut case'.

Get this...............

Note my first post on this site?

Well, Judge Laurence Ryan took offence to my first book about District Court Judges and instructed my ex- to take my children. As a 'ransom' and 'punishment' to me and my book.

Hands up who thinks that is a 'civilised' form of behaviour? 

Funny thing is my eldest went ' no way am I living with my father', and what does that tell you?
His father has continually abused our eldest child throughout the years, calling him 'stupid' among other name calling situations. My eldest felt undermined and his self-esteem went down due to this. So when it came to 'crunch time' my eldest said 'no way' to the family court'. (all tape recorded)

My daughter,  was lied too and manipulated by my ex-husband. But that has proven not to work because recently she cried to her lawyer that she 'misses her mum and bother and sister and can't understand why she can't see then'. She has been refused by my ex to see us because he is jealous and annoyed I put up his domestic violence tape recordings. Specks volumes for his character doesn't it!

Through the whole 13 years, I have NEVER obstructed access between him and the children. Yet I have been stopped from seeing my daughter who has said "I miss my mum". Wow, specks volumes for the New Zealand Family Court too, doesn't it.

I want to clarify to all my readers. I have never hurt my children in any way, shape or form. I have child psychology qualifications and  I AM ONE OF THE FEW IN THE WORLD TO HAVE CHILD CLEARNCES TO WORK WITH CHILDREN IN MY FIELD. I worked under the worlds BEST Child Psychologists for 12 months to get my clearance. I HAVE FBI clearance.

Guess who my daughters lawyer is..............and guess who my ex-husband's lawyer is.....

Guess what the Family Court don't want you to know about this case............

I'm going to tell you...............and I am going to tell you who my ex is, including his address and phone number.

























































 

Australian Family Court OVER RULES new zealand family court

http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/australia/9653222/Court-refuses-to-send-quake-affected-boys-to-NZ

Christchurch Family Court didn't have much fun with the quakes. There were major issues with (and it was mainly mothers but also a few fathers did this too) parents picking up kids and taking off. Either to other parts of NZ or off over seas. The claim was 'the kids were to traumatised from the quakes'.

Two groups to this occured. The parent who had been trying for a long time to relocate them and their children out of Christchurch and basically used the quakes as an excuse to leave (this didn't work and the where told to promptly return or the kids would be removed from them).

And the group that were 'genuine' about being traumatized by the quakes and had not been trying to escape with the kids from Christchurch before the quake. They were also told to promptly return.

This also all happened in the first round of Wellington quakes.

This mother is one of the 'genuine group'. And thankfully Australian Family Court Judges ARE BETTER TRAINED than new Zealand family court judges. Especially in the concepts of human behaviour.

But what I like about this article is that shows how a Family Court from another country can stand OVER and RULE OVER the new zealand family court.

So when the principal family court judge of new zealand tries to claim new zealand has a 'world class family law', just laugh at them- because they don't.


Note; The lower cases are purposely used in reference to new zealand and their judges because they are subrogates to other International Family Courts and don't deserve a capital letter. I should also note that new zealand lawyers and judges are known as 'piss heads' to international lawyers and judges. This was a comment made to me by a Australian Judge at a conference recently. Going by the fact Judge Ryan goes through a bottle of whiskey a week, it looks like I don't have to do much to ruin his reputation, as he is doing a fine job himself.

Stephanie Marsden also spends more on wine than she does on her power bill (the comparison is her power bill is huge as she has a pool. I know the cost of having a pool as I have one myself and my power bill is huge for it. So yes her wine consumption is massive when it's costing her more than her power bill!).


  

Family Court Judge's continue to violate Human Rights.

CLM v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development HC Auckland CIV 2009-404-7117 [2010] NZHC 1299; [2011] NZFLR 11 (28 June 2010)

Last Updated: 13 August 2010

NOTE: PURSUANT TO S 437A OF THE CHILDREN, YOUNG PERSONS, AND THEIR FAMILIES ACT 1989, ANY REPORT OF THIS PROCEEDING MUST COMPLY WITH SS 11B TO 11D OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT 1980

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
_{CIV-2009-404-7117}
UNDER the Judicature Amendment Act 1972 and/or Part 30 High Court Rules, the Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Act 1989 and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990
IN THE MATTER OF an interim custody order granted without notice by the Family Court at Waitakere on 14
October 2009 in respect of the plaintiff's

unborn child

BETWEEN CLM Plaintiff
AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT First Defendant
AND HELENE GREENING Second Defendant
AND THE FAMILY COURT AT WAITAKERE Third Defendant
Hearing: 19 May 2010
Appearances: Rodney Harrison QC and Dianne Martin for Plaintiff
Una Jagose and Rachel Roff for Defendants
Dagny Baltakmens for Third Defendant (to abide) Judgment: 28 June 2010
_{JUDGMENT OF HARRISON J}


Result
[62] I declare that the decision of the Family Court at Waitakere on 14 October
2009 to make an order without notice to CLM placing her then unborn child in the interim custody of the Ministry breached CLM's right to natural justice under s 27(1) NZBORA 1990.

[63] Costs normally follow the event. CLM is not legally aided. The Ministry is ordered to pay costs and disbursements.

[64] Mr Harrison sought an award for increased or indemnity costs based on what he describes as high-handed behaviour by the Ministry's representatives, both in applying without notice and in refusing to co-operate in suspending enforcement of the first order once CLM was served and made known her intention to apply to set it aside. He submits that an application for judicial review would not have been necessary but for the Ministry's intransigence and irrationality. In the result, CLM was forced to obtain an interim order in this Court on 30 October, largely on the same conditions as those imposed on the second order in the Family Court, when her complaint could have been dealt with promptly and efficiently, with the Ministry's co-operation, in the Family Court.

[65] I have some sympathy for Mr Harrison's argument. The conduct of the Ministry's solicitor in failing to respond constructively to proposals made by Ms Martin for interim resolution was unsatisfactory, arguably arbitrary. And Ms Jagose has properly drawn my attention to authority which might be invoked in support of an application for indemnity costs.


The THREE Family Court Judges involved in violating the Bill of Rights in this case are;

Judge Tony Fitzgerald
Judge Simon John Maude
Judge David Mather

I think these three can go on the Judges Directory blog.



 

Named and Shamed

http://nzfamilycourt.com/2014/01/22/family-court-cyf-combine-to-achieve-a-tragic-and-utterly-avoidable-outcome-for-families/

Named and Shamed

If CYFS, Police and the Family Court just admitted their mistake, then there wouldn't be such a backlash. But they can't seem to learn the basics of life!
There are a few more cases just like the first link on this to come out over the next few months. Including are now famous Stephanie Marsden, David Polson and many others.

Emails...they come in thick when I wake up!

Dear Mellissa Evans,

Why is it, that every time I post a topic. My phone buzzes with an email from you. You seem to think every post on this (news media) blog is about you. In fact, you recently stated in court that this whole blog was about you.

Please lady, don’t flatter yourself. The truth is………………

Yes, you are a malicious mother. I assisted your ex-husband in the Napier court because of your behavioural issues ie: you’re a liar (sorry there is no pill you can take for that).

The Napier Judges have respect for me, as I do for them. That is because I tell them ‘as it is’ (the truth because I have no alliance with either you or your husband) and they know I see things they do not. That is the relationship we have- trust. Other Judges sitting in courts around New Zealand will slowly learn this too (perhaps at the expense of their reputations).

Mellissa, don’t worry your feeble little mind. It is not you who is being sued. That’s not to say you should be.  You’re a ‘benefit bludger’ with no skills. How could my lawyer get enough money from you to buy my husband a Ferrari? You couldn’t buy us air freshener.

However, let me give you a little bit of advice (god knows I am good at that). Don’t ever annoy someone with more money or networking power than you. If you take a look at DOTCOM it is not panning out too well for the New Zealand Government.

You lost custody because of what YOU did, not what I did. Step back, take a look at yourself in the mirror. You have potential, but it is you who holds yourself back. Not me. I publicly scrutinise Judges, I take responsibility for that. This is what my life is, not yours. They are big boys and girls, they can defend themselves if they chose to do so. I am very successful in my career. I left home at 16 years old and lived on the streets of Australia and New Zealand (I have this thing called ‘life experience’, which is more than any Judge out there). I am a survivor of domestic violence. I have studied at Universality level, I am about to graduate with a second degree and I have the best children and husband the world could possibly offer. I speck three languages. I have friends whose yachts, I cruise on in the Sydney Harbour. I have two companies (in different countries) and friends earning millions. I am very ‘complete’ (as you like to put it) with myself. I am proud of what I do. Equally I am proud of the people I support. THAT INCLUDES FATHER RIGHTS GROUP and anti-Domestic Violence groups. My company works against child sex trafficking at an international level.

Guess what! you could be as successfully too, if you weren’t so bent on revenge against people. It’s called ‘empowerment’ and ‘confidence’. God help us all!

Note; To my readers, Mellissa Evans is a mother who would repeatedly obstructed contact and lied in order to use her children as ‘revenge’ against her husband. The father tape recorded all interactions with her and was successful in court. He now has custody of the three children and she only has access. She blames me for this (hands up who’s surprised?).

I do not live in New Zealand (in fact, according to my lawyer I am country-less due to the amount of country hopping I do- I never knew that!), therefore I can name the parents. After all, no person in one country could possible comply with the laws of a country they do not live in! New Zealand laws are not universal.  

If Mellissa contacts me again I will tell you where she lives and her phone number.

 With that said, the real fun now begins. Guess what….the Family Court has a secret (oh my gosh who knew)! And I am going to tell you what it is.

Kindest Regards

A win for american bloggers

http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/30011586/bloggers-get-first-amendment-protection

It's good to see that the courts are starting to realise what bloggers truly are. They provide news that is of public concern. As my followers know, I have a publishing company and therefore we have to have insurance (like most media outlets) for Defamation (in fact I have it twice via two companies).

I have just recently had approval from my insurance company to sue three particular people for defamation (it is not normal for this to be done, normally they only provide if someone sues you so this is a first). The comments these three people have made about me has been described by my lawyer the worst he has seen.

It really, truly amazes me how people don't realise these laws apply to them.

I am seeking quarter off a million dollars from each person and I intend to upload these court proceedings once my lawyer gives permission. You will also get to see who they are and what they did.

The great thing, is it will not cost me a cent and as everyone knows, insurance company's have unlimited funds and push very hard in court cases to win at all costs (as anyone who has been up against an insurance company knows). Plus we are filing in the High Court, so no idiot District Court Judges (who do not know the law) to deal with.

Personally, my family and I are relieved we can seek justice from these people for their very derogator comments and malicious behaviour. I hope they learn a very valuable life lesson.