New Zealand- a haven for child abuse

In America they do this....
http://abcnews.go.com/US/charges-texas-father-beat-death-daughters-molester/story?id=16612071

Which country do you prefer?

In New Zealand, child abuse is also fully supported and aided.......
http://nzfamilycourt.com/2013/09/07/why-professional-membership-is-no-panacea-to-gross-incompetence-and-why-family-court-counselling-so-deservedly-got-the-arse-card/

And when New Zealand FINALLY catches one out......turns out they are teachers! (Why its it that teachers always turn out to be the most abusive people?  I wonder if it's because they are teachers they think they can get away with lying and abusing kids, sometimes even their own kids!)

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10828404



 

Wanted....

Picture of Judge Timothy Druce.
I thought I had one but can't seem to find it.
I am needing it for my next post on him. It would seem wee Judge Druce is in a bit more trouble than originally thought going by his other cases coming through.
Using a child as blackmail may not be his only miss-deed.

I have also had a few people email me through complaints they have filed over him. A few more would be good, if anyone has any.



 

"a fraud is being committed on the courts".

Justice Simon France. He seems to have some brains into how people try and defraud the court!

Kim Dotcom
The Megaupload founder was arrested after an airborne assault on his mansion by machinegun-toting anti-terror police. The warrant used to storm and search the house was declared unlawful - a bungle which led to the Ofcanz admission they had brought the GCSB in to illegally spy on Mr Dotcom. The disastrous operation was carried out at the request of the FBI, which wanted to extradite Dotcom to the US on copyright charges.

The Judge who signed off on the Dotcom warrant was Judge McNaughton at the District Court North Shore. Winkelmann J did have a bit of a go at the Distrcit Court judge. At [55] she notes;

This is because the issuing Judge has expressed himself as satisfied that 'all'' of the items within the second to sixth listed bullet points in the appendix fall wintin s 44(1) (a) or (b).

Yet she disagreed....

[56] This issuing Judge could not have been satisfied that there were reasonable grounds for suspecting that all of the things listed in Appendix A were evidence of breach.......

It is always interesting, when a Judge writes up a Judgement, their words are hardly worth the paper they are written on. When a High Judge can come along and say 'no you were not satisfied'.

 Winkelmann goes on to say...For example, had he turned his mind to it, he would have identified that....

And that is where most District Court Judges go wrong. They forget about other issues or evidence and that tends to be what gets them into trouble.

Red Devils case
In Operation Explorer, an undercover agent worked his way into the Red Devils motorcycle gang in an 18-month investigation. But the case was thrown out by a High Court judge when it was discovered Ofcanz had faked a prosecution against the officer when they feared his cover would be blown. Police bosses said they believed they were acting with the permission of the then chief District Court judge. However, Justice Simon France ordered a stay of proceedings against the Red Devils group as he believed "a fraud is being committed on the courts".

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11119039

Smile your going to be on camera!

 

The Dunedin father/son case

I will explain further why cameras have been following one family since November last year. And why I would not want to be Judge Timothy Hindmarsh Druce when it airs! or should that be Judge 'Juice' as the fathers chanted outside court one day! (in which Judge Druce called the police, who in turn laughed at it too and then explained to this Judge they could not do anything about it- I think he is still annoyed by that).

Given that Judge Laurence Ryan reads this blog I have a wee message for him.

Judge Ryan you have mail. No, No , No, your Judges are incompetent and are not listening. Still being caught lying in court, ignoring evidence and not acting in the manner they should be. Go back and have a really good think. You know full well your Judges behaviour is being looked at by the UN and you know full well the media are airing your courts incompetence. Oh and you have some tape recordings to listen too as well. Since the media are playing them also for New Zealand to hear.

This post has been divided into three parts:
-Judge Druce
-Fathers response
-Media

So that was the fastest circulation of a court Judgement I have ever seen. It was posted in the facebook group about the case by other members! and comments have been flying all afternoon.
The lawyers still being chastised.

For those not in the facebook group (which is private and you have to request membership).
The Father has basically won the case. I mean seriously, the mother confirmed she was obstructing access. The idea you can stop parents and children seeing each other is ridicules, it's 2013 not 1908!

However, this does not in any way excuse the behaviour of the lawyers or Judge Druce. Judge Druce has also BLACKMAILED the father. Not a good thing to do when the rest of New Zealand is watching. Can he be privately prosecuted for this? as blackmail is a crime!

I have been holding off to tell everyone about New Zealand's wee Judge Druce. But I will not hold back now.

Remember this post.....
http://newzealandjudges.blogspot.co.nz/2012/05/oh-dear.html
Judge Timothy Hindmarsh Druce, his wife Christine May Druce, their daughter Katriona Olivia Druce and their son Tobin Barnaby James Druce all feature in my publication.

Judge Druce has been labelled by the High Court as an 'offensive' Judge as seen here.
http://menz.org.nz/2011/father-wins-costs-against-the-family-court-2/

He hates Fathers rights groups and the feeling is mutual! He has had a number if his Judgements overturned in the High Court due to them being 'inappropriate', 'offensive' and outside any legal bases.

In a meeting recently with other 'McKenzie Friends' (people who help self-litigates) Judge Druce was discussed. He is a 'bad', 'bad' Judge. One of the worst in New Zealand. This was an 'unanimous' agreement.

The Father in the above case has notified the courts of an Appeal. The reason being is Judge Druce has been caught, lying, making statements that were not discussed at the hearing, as others have seen on the facebook group there is evidence the Judge refused to acknowledge  (as half of New Zealand have also heard) and this Judge needs to be put in his place over his behaviour as  well as the lawyers.

A protest was already pre-planned for outside his home at 223 Hurstmere Road Takapuna Auckland- in case anyone wants to join in. Beware, there will be media cameras there.

A complaint to the JCC is also being filed about Judge Druce (and he is named in the UN communication). This is nothing new for him. He has had a few filed about him over the years.

Father,
The Father has asked me to post a response due to the number of texts he is getting.

This Father has so much support New Zealand wide it has been very overwhelming for him. It was the Father in this case, who got this from Judge Druce..
http://nzfamilycourt.com/2013/08/10/family-court-judge-ratifies-family-court-information-being-posted-on-this-website-with-conditions/

The Father has basically been declared a hero for achieving this!

When the Father read Judge Druce's judgement he laughed. Even he was able to pick out a number of Judge Druce's mistakes (mistakes for the UN complaint and the media coverage).

One point, the Father was the FIRST to notice (before anyone else) this............for those who have received a copy of Judge Druce's Judgment. Did anyone else see how the Judgement date was in 'hand written form' on the front cover as well as the last page (time 10.40pm too).

The Father then went on to say.......(and he said this to the reporter covering the case over the phone for a briefing)....'.he  (Judge Druce) was waiting on another court case, wasn't he'....more on this in the media post.

For those who know, there was another court case yesterday and yes I can confirm Judge Druce had pre-written the fathers Judgement over a week ago and then waited before signing and releasing it.
How do I know this?
Because 'Anonymous international' have been very involved with this case. I personally thank them for their assistance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN01hGedLGY&feature=youtu.be
I have seen these guys in action and it amazes even me! and 'good lord' the way lawyers and Judge communicate is appalling!

Media

As I have said the media have been following this case, I have permission from the production team to expand on what they have been doing.

Since November last year the Father and his family have been filmed and interviewed by a production team who wish to present to New Zealand just what is occurring in the Family Court and the corruption of lawyers and Judges.

As the case has evolved the media have got even more intrigued. The question raised is just what is going on in the court system?

The production team have gone from a short case, to a two part series. They are negotiating more air time for this case due to it's length and the issues addressed.

I have also said that this case was the most 'perfect' case to show New Zealand how the Family Court is operating.
Due to the Father knowing just what the lawyers in this case had 'planned' for him in court, four McKenzie friends gathered with this father and gave instruction on just what to say in court and how to act. This case will go down as 'thee case' which will force Judge Ryan to step down.

Why will Judge Ryan have to step down?

Because he knows this father and his family himself. The production team are going to seek an interview with him over the case (as well as a number of others) and Judge Ryan himself (due to his knowledge of the father) faces sever criticism with the UN (It's probably important to note there is an international website up about the case. But it is not visible in New Zealand. This site has been sent to a very large number of international family law partitioners who have said how disgusting the New Zealand Family Court looks. Their comments will be seen on the aired production).

When Judge Ryan wrote to me, he believe in a 'balanced view'. You will see this in the case. Other people who know- not just the mother in this case- but others who CAN be named and not subjected to name suppression under the Family Proceedings Act , are also interviewed.
There are going to be people in New Zealand very annoyed with the mother in this case, for having all their dirty deeds brought to the public, in full glory of how people really think of them.

Judge Timothy Druce is not the only Judge also looking very poorly. There are five other Judges who are not going to fair to well before New Zealand either.

The father and his family have expressed how relieved they are at being able to show New Zealand their evidence at how corrupt the New Zealand Courts are. How people (mainly custodial parents) lie and manipulate people. And how much 'hatred' people generate towards ex-partners and their attempt's to use children as weapons. You will see people's true colours through interviews with their ex-work mates or people they have got into fights with, same sex-kissing etc.....seriously...New Zealand is going to see it all!

Of course you will also see Judges acting in the very manner I have previous published (and will continue to publish). They are incompetent, corrupt, they lie in court, refuse evidence, write things in Judgements that are never discussed in court and the list goes on.....

So once the production team confirm they have finished their filming and get a confirmed time to air I will post it! Pass this on...I want all of New Zealand to watch it!! I personally think this is the "David Bain" case of the Family Court. So much evidence will be seen that the reporter has responded herself to how corrupt the District Court Judges are.

 

Three-quarters of a million dollars $$$$$ For a Mother to see her children

This case was one of the most expensive cases that I am aware of from the Christchurch Family Court. Both parties spent about 700,000 between them during the 10 year battle.

The High Court ruled this case as 'extraordinary'. Another High Court hearing into the case made the Judge 'livid' with the process of the Family Court. It's seems the High Court are forever telling the  Family Court off. It is almost coming to the point where the High Court really need to be in charge as the District Court Judges are struggling to understand the basics!
This is a media interview with the mother about the case.

Some of my readers are having trouble downloading the pages. I am working on fixing this.

More Family Court Responces.....

Been there a couple of years ago... it is HARD, but stay focused. Don't doubt yourself or question yourself or you will lose your mind!
Tips:
- no lawyer is your friend, they're all only in it for the money, so stick to your guns and don't let a lawyer try and persuade you to agree with something you're not comfortable with.
-write your own affidavits. That way you know you have everything you want to cover in there. I wrote mine then emailed them to my lawyer who rewrote them in the correct layout.
- look after yourself because, from my experience, it's a sh!t ride but it does end! :-)
ETA I think the system has changed since I went through it but it not sure in which ways.
Happy to answer any questions you may have too.
Edited by chatterbox123 at 11:17 pm, Wed 27 Feb
chatterbox123               11:15 pm, Wed 27 Feb


My daughter just turned 16, so we are no longer subject to the family courts. It would have been nice though if somewhere along the line some had called up and said...so how's it going. Don't for one second believe they care about what happens to you, you are just another case for a disinterested judge to put in place an order that they think is best. It is not in the best interests of the child no matter how they spin it. For your child/ren's sake try to resolve it amicably out of court. Put your kids first
spydawoman              11:37 pm, Wed 27 Feb



First time round it took over a year and a half and the actual final court part took four solid days. It was awful as I was so damn nervous. As the years rolled by and we went in and out of court I got better and better at it. I learned that just because they write it doesn't mean they can back it up in court, and without evidence it is not accepted. I learned that no a damn thing is unique and that the judges have heard it all before. I learned that you never ever insult the other person and no matter how hard it is find something positive to say about them as a parent. But most of all I learned never to leave anything out and to follow your lawyer's advice to proceed to a tee and not to be nervous about how the other person may react.

                               

conniem 4:45 pm, Thu 28 Feb

Been thru it twice, last time earlier this month,wasd the worst experience of my life,i cried solidly for 4 days afterwards.......avoid at all cost
tahja22 4:51 pm, Thu 28 Feb


conniem wrote:
First time round it took over a year and a half and the actual final court part took four solid days. It was awful as I was so damn nervous. As the years rolled by and we went in and out of court I got better and better at it. I learned that just because they write it doesn't mean they can back it up in court, and without evidence it is not accepted. I learned that no a damn thing is unique and that the judges have heard it all before. I learned that you never ever insult the other person and no matter how hard it is find something positive to say about them as a parent. But most of all I learned never to leave anything out and to follow your lawyer's advice to proceed to a tee and not to be nervous about how the other person may react.

Agree with this person and remind yourself that it is all about the children and their best interests not the best interests of the parents. If you think you are going to be in for a long road under the FC system then its also a good idea to access some counselling as it is very hard emotionally trying to deal with lies that other people write about you.

hannahsmummy  6:51 am, Fri 1 Mar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Judicial Conduct- Leak #1

So, I have said previously how the Judicial Conduct Commissioner's assistant was sending me material from her office. Well it gives a bit of an insight into what happens to a complaint when it is filed.

So I have decided to start leaking this material out.

The first batch......

and the attachment was............

So from what I can gather, a Judge told a self-litigant to 'pack your bag and go. Get out of Court right now". Which in my opinion is just a bit rude really. How can a Judge who acts like this really be respected?
Spread sheets are the system of use for the JCC, going by all the others I also received.

Anyway, Christine Wren is apparently no longer working at the JCC, there's a new chick!